What you should know about breast augmentation

The breast augmentation is one of the most common cosmetic surgeries around the world. Like any surgical intervention, its performance involves certain risks and requires dedication for optimal postoperative recovery. To ensure a safe procedure, it is essential to trust properly trained professionals. But it is equally important for the patient to prepare physically and mentally to go through the entire Mammaplasty process. In this article, we review what you should know about breast augmentation before doing it.

What is breast augmentation?

Augmentation Mammaplasty consists of a surgery carried out with the purpose of increasing the size of the breasts. To do this, implants are incorporated under the breast tissue or the chest muscles. These implants are covered by a flexible silicone outer covering and may contain a saline solution or a silicone gel.

This procedure must be performed by a plastic surgeon, after previous consultations for orientation and planning with the patient.

MOST USED MATERIALS FOR CHEST IMPLANTS

Among the most used materials for this type of operation are silicone prostheses and serum prostheses that have different characteristics:

Silicone prosthesis: They are the most used. Silicone prosthesis is composed of three layers of polyurethane and its filling can be of two types:

Cohesive gel: it is characterized by a greater bond between the molecules of the gel, which gives it greater density. In the unlikely event of a prosthesis rupture, the gel, being more consistent, does not migrate to other parts of the body.

Soft gel: The shape of this type of prosthesis changes depending on the movements and pressure that are made on the breast. In the event that the prosthesis breaks, the gel will come out of the capsule, spreading through the breast tissue. So it is not entirely recommended.

Serum prosthesis: The content of this type of prosthesis is compatible with the body, so in case of breakage of the material or leakage of the capsule, it could be reabsorbed by the body itself. Despite this, we also find some disadvantages such as the loss of volume of the breast over time or the undulation of the upper part of it.

What is augmentation Mammaplasty for?

This surgery is usually related to aesthetic purposes and it is important not to stigmatize its purposes and benefits. Most of the women who opt for Mammaplasty do so because they feel unhappy with their appearance. Some for having naturally small breast, others to correct differences in size or to reverse a reduction after pregnancy.

However, Mammaplasty can also be part of a breast reconstruction process, which is necessary after going through certain diseases (breast cancer, for example). In any case, breast augmentation allows many women to strengthen their self-esteem and confidence. And this translates into a positive impact not only on a physical level, but fundamentally on an emotional and social level.

What are the risks of breast augmentation surgery?

All surgery involves a degree of risk and, therefore, it is essential to have the support of trained professionals. But augmentation Mammaplasty can also lead to certain complications after surgery, such as:

Sensitivity changes in the breasts, especially in the nipples.
Pain in the breasts, mainly during the postoperative period.
Infections (postoperative care is essential to prevent them).
Development of systemic symptoms described in the so-called breast implant disease.
Distortion of the shape of the implant mainly associated with a contraction produced by the healing of the tissue.
Loss or patella of the implant.

We know that breast augmentation surgery has its risks and complications, however, they are temporary and scarce, and so we should not fear undergoing the operation. Being an optional surgical treatment, we have the last word in our hand.

If you want an assessment of our plastic surgeon, Dr. Lane Smith, make an appointment! The first assessment consultation is free.

Can the Police Draw Your Blood Without a Warrant? Supreme Court to Decide

The United States Supreme Court recently decided to hear a case that could have an impact on the approximately 1.4 million people who are arrested nationwide for driving while intoxicated each year. The legal issue before the court is whether those who have been stopped on suspicion of DWI have Fourth Amendment protection against forced blood tests.

The case, Missouri v. McNeely, began when a highway patrol officer in Missouri pulled over Tyler McNeely for speeding. During the stop, the officer claimed that McNeely’s behavior gave him cause to believe that he was intoxicated. The officer ordered McNeely out of the car and administered a field sobriety test; McNeely performed the test poorly. Due to McNeely’s performance on the test, the officer asked him to submit to a blood test.

McNeely did not consent to the blood test. Because of this, the officer drove him to a clinic and instructed a staff member to draw blood from McNeely, over his protests. When the results of the blood test came back, they showed that McNeely’s blood alcohol level was nearly two times the legal limit. As a result, McNeely was arrested for DWI.

Before the trial, McNeely’s lawyers made a motion to exclude the blood test results from being used as evidence at the trial. To support the motion, the attorneys argued that the blood test results are inadmissible as evidence, because no search warrant was issued.

Prosecutors said that the blood test was admissible as evidence. They argued that in the time it would take to procure a warrant, the alcohol in McNeely’s system would be metabolized. They argued that officers were legally justified in drawing the blood without a warrant, because a delay would cause a destruction of evidence and would weaken their claim that McNeely was driving drunk.

The Missouri trial judge ruled in favor of McNeely’s attorneys, prohibiting the blood test results from being used as evidence. When the prosecution appealed the decision, the appeals court reversed the trial court’s ruling. However, when the case was taken to the Missouri Supreme Court, it ruled that that it was not legally justified for the officer to order the blood test without a warrant, because there were no special facts or “exigent circumstances” that would legally justify the hasty drawing of the blood.

Across the nation, courts are split on whether the dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream creates a sufficient emergency to legally justify the drawing of blood without a warrant. Since the United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case, it will make the ultimate decision and resolve the nationwide differences on this legal point.

Ruling’s effect on Texas law

The effect that the Supreme Court’s ruling will have on Texas law is unclear. In the past, it has been common for certain counties in Texas to implement a “no refusal” weekend program where drivers accused of DUI are not allowed to refuse blood tests. However, due to the fact that the blood drawn under this program is pursuant to a judge-issued search warrant, it is fairly unlikely that the McNeely decision will affect the legality of such programs.

In Texas, a DWI suspect’s blood may be drawn without a warrant for various DWI offenses such as third offense drunk driving and intoxication assault or manslaughter cases. However, the issue in the McNeely case is limited to whether the natural metabolism of blood is sufficient justification to allow warrantless drawing of blood. Since the McNeely case does not address whether such laws are constitutional, it is unclear if the decision will have any effect on this Texas law.

The McNeely case is not expected to be decided until spring of 2013. However the court rules, drunk driving will remain a serious offense in Texas and carry significant penalties. If you have been arrested for DWI, it is vital for you to protect your rights. An experienced criminal defense attorney can put together a strong and effective defense and work to obtain the best possible outcome.

Article provided by The Shapiro Law Firm
Visit us at www.theshapirolawfirm.com

The Best Trail Running Race in Dullstroom

Between Gauteng and the Kruger National Park lies the quaint village of Dullstroom. An area renowned for its fly fishing hot spots, trail running, outdoor activities and gorgeous natural surroundings. The area is particularly popular during winter school holidays and for good reason too – this is when the Dullstroom Winter Festival is held. What makes this festival so popular? It is considered the festival that celebrates “Christmas in July”.

Trail running in Dullstroom is quite focused on this particular event. The run, which takes place during the festival, offers entrants the options of a 7km run or a 14km run. Those who participate will be provided with the perfect opportunity to explore the beautiful outskirts of the village where clear streams and gorgeous highlands await.

Prizes for those who excel at this trail run include shopping vouchers, gift hampers, weekends away in Dullstroom, and of course each entrant will be presented with a medal. The entries are limited to 200 people so those who are interested usually book their spot as soon as they know that they would like to be involved.

When looking to participate in this sort of outdoor event in Dullstroom, the Walkersons Hotel and Spa is the perfect place to overnight (or spend the weekend). Many who have taken the time to explore the area have been completely enthralled by the facilities on offer and of course the convenience of the proximity of the venue to all the activities of the festival is a great draw card.

Those who wish to explore other trails in the area will find that there are many to choose from. All of them are in the midst of abundant nature and there is every reason to believe that you will be provided with the perfect opportunity to clear your mind and rejuvenate body and soul when paying a visit.